A MarrinervsWest Ham
Analysis based on 39 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Marriner officiates West Ham matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 39 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows West Ham achieves a 17.9% win rate under A Marriner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 27.1 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -27.1%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 39 matches, West Ham has won 27 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Marriner is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
39 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Dec 2021 | Chelsea(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 15 May 2021 | Brighton(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 5 Dec 2020 | Man United(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 18 Jan 2020 | Everton(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 26 Dec 2019 | Crystal Palace(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 4 Dec 2019 | Wolves(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 24 Nov 2018 | Man City(H) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 19 Nov 2017 | Watford(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 15 Apr 2017 | Sunderland(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π₯ 1 | Premier League |
| 6 Mar 2017 | Chelsea(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 26 Dec 2016 | Swansea(A) | 4 - 1 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 5 Nov 2016 | Stoke(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 28 Aug 2016 | Man City(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 2 Mar 2016 | Tottenham(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 12 Dec 2015 | Stoke(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 4 Mar 2015 | Chelsea(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 31 Jan 2015 | Liverpool(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 18 Jan 2014 | Newcastle(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 14 Dec 2013 | Sunderland(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 15 Sept 2013 | Southampton(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 30 Mar 2013 | West Brom(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 23 Jan 2013 | Arsenal(A) | 1 - 5 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 25 Nov 2012 | Tottenham(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 5 Mar 2011 | Stoke(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 15 Jan 2011 | Arsenal(H) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 2 Oct 2010 | Fulham(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 21 Aug 2010 | Bolton(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 2 May 2010 | Fulham(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 27 Mar 2010 | Stoke(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 26 Jan 2010 | Portsmouth(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 15 Dec 2009 | Bolton(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 31 Oct 2009 | Sunderland(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 3π₯ 1 | Premier League |
| 19 Sept 2009 | Liverpool(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 1 Nov 2008 | Middlesbrough(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 27 Sept 2008 | Fulham(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 29 Mar 2008 | Sunderland(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 25 Aug 2007 | Wigan(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 18 Mar 2005 | Leicester(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2004 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for West Ham
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.