A MarrinervsChelsea
Analysis based on 45 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Marriner officiates Chelsea matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 45 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Chelsea achieves a 48.9% win rate under A Marriner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 3.9 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
45 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Mar 2023 | Leicester(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 5 Mar 2022 | Burnley(A) | 4 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 4 Dec 2021 | West Ham(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Burnley(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 12 May 2021 | Arsenal(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 4 Feb 2021 | Tottenham(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 22 Jul 2020 | Liverpool(A) | 3 - 5 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 11 Jul 2020 | Sheffield United(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Bournemouth(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 19 Oct 2019 | Newcastle(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 27 Feb 2019 | Tottenham(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 29 Sept 2018 | Liverpool(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | β | Premier League |
| 1 Apr 2018 | Tottenham(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | β | Premier League |
| 12 Dec 2017 | Huddersfield(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 14 Oct 2017 | Crystal Palace(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 8 Apr 2017 | Bournemouth(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 6 Mar 2017 | West Ham(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 14 Jan 2017 | Leicester(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 15 Oct 2016 | Leicester(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 11 Sept 2016 | Swansea(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 9 Apr 2016 | Swansea(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 26 Dec 2015 | Watford(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 12 Sept 2015 | Everton(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 10 May 2015 | Liverpool(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 12 Apr 2015 | QPR(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 4 Mar 2015 | West Ham(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 22 Mar 2014 | Arsenal(H) | 6 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 21 Sept 2013 | Fulham(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 24 Feb 2013 | Man City(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 12 Jan 2013 | Stoke(A) | 4 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 15 Sept 2012 | QPR(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 10 Mar 2012 | Stoke(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 31 Jan 2012 | Swansea(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 3π₯ 1 | Premier League |
| 29 Oct 2011 | Arsenal(H) | 3 - 5 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 30 Apr 2011 | Tottenham(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 6 Feb 2011 | Liverpool(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 28 Nov 2010 | Newcastle(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 25 Sept 2010 | Man City(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 28 Dec 2009 | Fulham(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 29 Nov 2009 | Arsenal(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 23 Aug 2009 | Fulham(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | β | Premier League |
| 28 Dec 2008 | Fulham(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 29 Oct 2008 | Hull(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 14 Apr 2008 | Wigan(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | β | Premier League |
| 24 Nov 2007 | Derby(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 1π₯ 1 | Premier League |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Chelsea
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.