R StylesvsReading
Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Styles officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 25% win rate under R Styles, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -20.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 8 matches, Reading has won 20 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Styles is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
8 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2007 | Arsenal(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Arsenal: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 12 Aug 2007 | Man United(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2🟥 1 Man United: — | Premier League |
| 6 Dec 2006 | Newcastle(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Newcastle: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 12 Nov 2006 | Tottenham(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Tottenham: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 30 Apr 2005 | Wolves(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Wolves: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 21 Feb 2004 | Gillingham(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 2 Gillingham: — | Championship |
| 28 Sept 2002 | Stoke(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 Stoke: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2000 | Bristol Rvs(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 4 Bristol Rvs: 🟨 5🟥 2 | League One |
When R Styles officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 25% win rate under R Styles, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.