R StylesvsMan City
Analysis based on 20 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Styles officiates Man City matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 20 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Man City achieves a 10% win rate under R Styles, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -35.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 20 matches, Man City has won 35 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Styles is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
20 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Dec 2008 | Fulham(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Man City: π¨ 1 Fulham: π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 20 Oct 2008 | Newcastle(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Man City: π¨ 2 Newcastle: βπ₯ 1 | Premier League |
| 29 Mar 2008 | Birmingham(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 2 Birmingham: βπ₯ 1 | Premier League |
| 25 Feb 2008 | Everton(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Man City: βπ₯ 1 Everton: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 5 May 2007 | Man United(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 2 Man United: π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 21 Apr 2007 | Watford(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Man City: π¨ 1 Watford: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 17 Dec 2006 | Tottenham(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 1 Tottenham: β | Premier League |
| 25 Nov 2006 | Liverpool(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 1 Liverpool: π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 25 Mar 2006 | Chelsea(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 3π₯ 1 Chelsea: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 21 Jan 2006 | Bolton(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 2 Bolton: π¨ 2 | Premier League |
| 5 Nov 2005 | Fulham(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 3 Fulham: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 15 May 2005 | Middlesbrough(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Man City: π¨ 2 Middlesbrough: π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 2 Apr 2005 | Charlton(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Man City: β Charlton: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 28 Feb 2005 | Norwich(A) | 3 - 2 | WIN | Man City: π¨ 2 Norwich: π¨ 2π₯ 1 | Premier League |
| 4 Jan 2005 | Arsenal(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Man City: π¨ 3 Arsenal: π¨ 3 | Premier League |
| 28 Feb 2004 | Chelsea(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Man City: β Chelsea: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 27 Apr 2003 | West Ham(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 1 West Ham: π¨ 1 | Premier League |
| 11 Jan 2003 | Leeds(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Man City: β Leeds: π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 31 Mar 2001 | Aston Villa(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 6π₯ 1 Aston Villa: π¨ 4 | Premier League |
| 28 Oct 2000 | Arsenal(A) | 0 - 5 | LOSS | Man City: π¨ 3π₯ 1 Arsenal: β | Premier League |
When R Styles officiates Man City matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 20 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Man City achieves a 10% win rate under R Styles, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Man City
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.2 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.