πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

R JonesvsLeicester

Analysis based on 13 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

6
Wins
2
Draws
5
Losses

When R Jones officiates Leicester matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 13 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Leicester achieves a 46.2% win rate under R Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 1.2 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+1.2%
Matches Analyzed
13

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+1.2%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

13 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
7 Apr 2025Newcastle(H)0 - 3LOSS
🟨 2
Premier League
26 Jan 2025Tottenham(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 5
Premier League
12 Apr 2024Plymouth(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
Championship
8 May 2023Fulham(A)3 - 5LOSS
🟨 3
Premier League
4 Mar 2023Southampton(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
Premier League
29 Oct 2022Man City(H)0 - 1LOSS
β€”
Premier League
3 Oct 2022Nott'm Forest(H)4 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Premier League
10 Apr 2022Crystal Palace(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
Premier League
1 Dec 2021Southampton(A)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 3
Premier League
28 Aug 2021Norwich(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
Premier League
30 Apr 2021Southampton(A)1 - 1DRAW
β€”
Premier League
3 Feb 2021Fulham(A)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
Premier League
3 Jan 2021Newcastle(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 2
Premier League

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)46.2%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+1.2%

Cards for Leicester

🟨 Yellows / Game1.85
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.69
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.08

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.