🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

N SwarbrickvsRochdale

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses

When N Swarbrick officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 28.6% win rate under N Swarbrick, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Rochdale has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when N Swarbrick is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
14 Nov 2015Wigan(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League One
23 Nov 2010Carlisle(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 3
League One
4 Sept 2009Morecambe(A)3 - 3DRAW
League Two
17 Feb 2009Morecambe(H)1 - 1DRAW
League Two
5 Dec 2007Accrington(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1🟥 1
League Two
27 Jan 2007Milton Keynes Dons(H)5 - 0WIN
🟨 3
League Two
14 Jan 2006Stockport(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Rochdale

🟨 Yellows / Game1.43
🟥 Reds / Game0.14

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.00
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.14

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.