N SwarbrickvsMan City
Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When N Swarbrick officiates Man City matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Man City achieves a 90% win rate under N Swarbrick, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
✅ FAVORABLE RECORD
This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.
Favorable Pattern Detected
With a bias score of +45.0%, Man City has historically performed 45 percentage points better under N Swarbrick than their average. This favorable pattern across 10 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
10 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2018 | West Ham(A) | 4 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 23 Sept 2017 | Crystal Palace(H) | 5 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Premier League |
| 15 Apr 2017 | Southampton(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | — | Premier League |
| 8 Mar 2017 | Stoke(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 13 Feb 2017 | Bournemouth(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Premier League |
| 24 Sept 2016 | Swansea(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 4 | Premier League |
| 21 Mar 2015 | West Brom(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | — | Premier League |
| 22 Nov 2014 | Swansea(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 18 Jan 2014 | Cardiff(H) | 4 - 2 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 30 Mar 2013 | Newcastle(H) | 4 - 0 | WIN | — | Premier League |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Man City
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.