DorkingReferee Analysis
Analysis of 46 referees across 92 matches
Most Biased Against
M Crusham
Bias Score: -45.0%•1 games
Most Favorable
M Dicicco
Bias Score: +55.0%•1 games
Our comprehensive referee bias analysis for Dorking examines 46 referees across 92 matches, revealing fascinating patterns in how different officials impact the team's performance. The data shows a 100.0 percentage point spread between the most favorable and most biased referees, with some officials showing particularly notable negative patterns. M Crusham ranks as the most biased against Dorking with a -45.0% bias score over 1 matches. Conversely, M Dicicco has overseen the team's best performances with a +55.0% bias score. This analysis helps football fans, bettors, and fantasy managers understand historical referee-team dynamics and make more informed decisions.
All Referees Ranked by Bias
Note: Showing 2 referees with 5+ games. Bias Score compares win rate under each referee vs. baseline (45%). Click any referee for detailed match-by-match analysis.