⚽ Team Analysis
BoltonReferee Analysis
Analysis of 160 referees across 1000 matches
160
Referees
1000
Matches
⚠️
Most Biased Against
R Ricardo
Bias Score: -45.0%•2 games
✅
Most Favorable
M Fletcher
Bias Score: +55.0%•1 games
Our comprehensive referee bias analysis for Bolton examines 160 referees across 1000 matches, revealing fascinating patterns in how different officials impact the team's performance. The data shows a 100.0 percentage point spread between the most favorable and most biased referees, with some officials showing particularly notable negative patterns. R Ricardo ranks as the most biased against Bolton with a -45.0% bias score over 2 matches. Conversely, M Fletcher has overseen the team's best performances with a +55.0% bias score. This analysis helps football fans, bettors, and fantasy managers understand historical referee-team dynamics and make more informed decisions.
All Referees Ranked by Bias
#
Referee
Games
Win Rate
Bias Score
🟨/G
Verdict
1
#1A Woolmer
5
0.0%
-45.0%
1.4
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
2
#2P Bankes
6
0.0%
-45.0%
1.5
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
3
#3T Harrington
8
0.0%
-45.0%
1.5
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
4
#4E Ilderton
6
0.0%
-45.0%
1.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
5
#5D Elleray
5
0.0%
-45.0%
1.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
6
#6M Jones
12
8.3%
-36.7%
2.1
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
12
Win Rate
8.3%
Bias Score
-36.7%
7
#7S Hooper
11
9.1%
-35.9%
1.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
11
Win Rate
9.1%
Bias Score
-35.9%
8
#8A D'Urso
11
9.1%
-35.9%
1.4
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
11
Win Rate
9.1%
Bias Score
-35.9%
9
#9K Stroud
10
10.0%
-35.0%
2.2
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
10
Win Rate
10.0%
Bias Score
-35.0%
10
#10O Langford
9
11.1%
-33.9%
1.2
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
11.1%
Bias Score
-33.9%
11
#11M Messias
8
12.5%
-32.5%
1.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
12.5%
Bias Score
-32.5%
12
#12M Haywood
7
14.3%
-30.7%
2.1
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
14.3%
Bias Score
-30.7%
13
#13P Wright
6
16.7%
-28.3%
1.5
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
14
#14J Linington
6
16.7%
-28.3%
1.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
15
#15S Barrott
6
16.7%
-28.3%
1.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
16
#16J Adcock
6
16.7%
-28.3%
1.7
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
17
#17R Jones
6
16.7%
-28.3%
1.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
18
#18L Doughty
5
20.0%
-25.0%
1.4
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
19
#19D England
5
20.0%
-25.0%
1.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
20
#20D Gallagher
10
20.0%
-25.0%
1.2
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
10
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
21
#21J Simpson
9
22.2%
-22.8%
1.8
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
22.2%
Bias Score
-22.8%
22
#22A Davies
9
22.2%
-22.8%
2.8
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
22.2%
Bias Score
-22.8%
23
#23M Riley
9
22.2%
-22.8%
3.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
22.2%
Bias Score
-22.8%
24
#24A Madley
12
25.0%
-20.0%
2.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
12
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
25
#25S Bennett
20
25.0%
-20.0%
2.1
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
20
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
26
#26R Styles
23
26.1%
-18.9%
2.2
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
23
Win Rate
26.1%
Bias Score
-18.9%
27
#27A Marriner
15
26.7%
-18.3%
1.9
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
15
Win Rate
26.7%
Bias Score
-18.3%
28
#28C Boyeson
11
27.3%
-17.7%
1.4
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
11
Win Rate
27.3%
Bias Score
-17.7%
29
#29C Foy
29
27.6%
-17.4%
1.4
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
29
Win Rate
27.6%
Bias Score
-17.4%
30
#30A Wiley
32
28.1%
-16.9%
2.0
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
32
Win Rate
28.1%
Bias Score
-16.9%
31
#31T Nield
7
28.6%
-16.4%
1.9
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
32
#32M Edwards
7
28.6%
-16.4%
0.6
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
33
#33D Webb
7
28.6%
-16.4%
1.1
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
34
#34S Attwell
7
28.6%
-16.4%
2.1
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
35
#35G Barber
7
28.6%
-16.4%
1.6
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
36
#36P Durkin
7
28.6%
-16.4%
1.1
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
37
#37G Scott
10
30.0%
-15.0%
1.9
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
10
Win Rate
30.0%
Bias Score
-15.0%
38
#38P Walton
20
30.0%
-15.0%
1.1
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
20
Win Rate
30.0%
Bias Score
-15.0%
39
#39R Joyce
13
30.8%
-14.2%
1.6
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
13
Win Rate
30.8%
Bias Score
-14.2%
40
#40L Probert
13
30.8%
-14.2%
1.4
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
13
Win Rate
30.8%
Bias Score
-14.2%
41
#41S Martin
15
33.3%
-11.7%
1.7
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
15
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
42
#42M Clattenburg
30
33.3%
-11.7%
1.8
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
30
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
43
#43G Poll
15
33.3%
-11.7%
1.9
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
15
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
44
#44D Drysdale
11
36.4%
-8.6%
1.6
📊 Neutral
Games
11
Win Rate
36.4%
Bias Score
-8.6%
45
#45M Dean
27
37.0%
-8.0%
1.9
📊 Neutral
Games
27
Win Rate
37.0%
Bias Score
-8.0%
46
#46D Rock
8
37.5%
-7.5%
1.6
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
37.5%
Bias Score
-7.5%
47
#47A Backhouse
8
37.5%
-7.5%
2.4
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
37.5%
Bias Score
-7.5%
48
#48A Haines
8
37.5%
-7.5%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
37.5%
Bias Score
-7.5%
49
#49K Friend
8
37.5%
-7.5%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
37.5%
Bias Score
-7.5%
50
#50H Webb
23
39.1%
-5.9%
1.5
📊 Neutral
Games
23
Win Rate
39.1%
Bias Score
-5.9%
51
#51D Bourne
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
52
#52G Ward
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
53
#53J Oldham
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.4
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
54
#54T Kettle
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
55
#55P Dowd
30
40.0%
-5.0%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
30
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
56
#56N Barry
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.6
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
57
#57L Swabey
7
42.9%
-2.1%
2.4
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
58
#58D Coote
7
42.9%
-2.1%
2.7
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
59
#59J Winter
7
42.9%
-2.1%
1.4
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
60
#60G Eltringham
16
43.8%
-1.3%
1.5
📊 Neutral
Games
16
Win Rate
43.8%
Bias Score
-1.3%
61
#61C Brook
9
44.4%
-0.6%
2.7
📊 Neutral
Games
9
Win Rate
44.4%
Bias Score
-0.6%
62
#62O Yates
10
50.0%
+5.0%
2.2
📊 Neutral
Games
10
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
63
#63C Hicks
6
50.0%
+5.0%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
6
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
64
#64N Hair
8
50.0%
+5.0%
1.1
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
65
#65S Oldham
8
50.0%
+5.0%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
66
#66S Purkiss
6
50.0%
+5.0%
1.5
📊 Neutral
Games
6
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
67
#67P Tierney
6
50.0%
+5.0%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
6
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
68
#68C Breakspear
11
54.5%
+9.5%
1.4
📊 Neutral
Games
11
Win Rate
54.5%
Bias Score
+9.5%
69
#69S Duncan
11
54.5%
+9.5%
1.4
📊 Neutral
Games
11
Win Rate
54.5%
Bias Score
+9.5%
70
#70S Dunn
9
55.6%
+10.6%
1.8
✅ Favorable
Games
9
Win Rate
55.6%
Bias Score
+10.6%
71
#71U Rennie
16
56.3%
+11.3%
1.3
✅ Favorable
Games
16
Win Rate
56.3%
Bias Score
+11.3%
72
#72S Stockbridge
14
57.1%
+12.1%
1.6
✅ Favorable
Games
14
Win Rate
57.1%
Bias Score
+12.1%
73
#73M Atkinson
14
57.1%
+12.1%
1.9
✅ Favorable
Games
14
Win Rate
57.1%
Bias Score
+12.1%
74
#74D Deadman
5
60.0%
+15.0%
1.8
✅ Favorable
Games
5
Win Rate
60.0%
Bias Score
+15.0%
75
#75R Madley
6
66.7%
+21.7%
1.3
✅ Favorable
Games
6
Win Rate
66.7%
Bias Score
+21.7%
76
#76S Allison
6
66.7%
+21.7%
1.7
✅ Favorable
Games
6
Win Rate
66.7%
Bias Score
+21.7%
77
#77B Toner
10
70.0%
+25.0%
2.2
✅ Favorable
Games
10
Win Rate
70.0%
Bias Score
+25.0%
78
#78M Coy
8
75.0%
+30.0%
1.0
✅ Favorable
Games
8
Win Rate
75.0%
Bias Score
+30.0%
79
#79W Finnie
6
83.3%
+38.3%
1.8
✅ Favorable
Games
6
Win Rate
83.3%
Bias Score
+38.3%
80
#80B Speedie
8
87.5%
+42.5%
1.5
✅ Favorable
Games
8
Win Rate
87.5%
Bias Score
+42.5%
Note: Showing 80 referees with 5+ games. Bias Score compares win rate under each referee vs. baseline (45%). Click any referee for detailed match-by-match analysis.