← Back to Home
⚽ Team Analysis
DoncasterReferee Analysis
Analysis of 206 referees across 979 matches
206
Referees
979
Matches
⚠️
Most Biased Against
T Reeves
Bias Score: -45.0%•3 games
✅
Most Favorable
Ray Olivier
Bias Score: +55.0%•1 games
Our comprehensive referee bias analysis for Doncaster examines 206 referees across 979 matches, revealing fascinating patterns in how different officials impact the team's performance. The data shows a 100.0 percentage point spread between the most favorable and most biased referees, with some officials showing particularly notable negative patterns. T Reeves ranks as the most biased against Doncaster with a -45.0% bias score over 3 matches. Conversely, Ray Olivier has overseen the team's best performances with a +55.0% bias score. This analysis helps football fans, bettors, and fantasy managers understand historical referee-team dynamics and make more informed decisions.
All Referees Ranked by Bias
#
Referee
Games
Win Rate
Bias Score
🟨/G
Verdict
1
#1R Lewis
7
0.0%
-45.0%
2.1
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
2
#2G Eltringham
5
0.0%
-45.0%
1.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
3
#3L Probert
6
0.0%
-45.0%
0.7
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
0.0%
Bias Score
-45.0%
4
#4P Wright
10
10.0%
-35.0%
1.2
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
10
Win Rate
10.0%
Bias Score
-35.0%
5
#5A Young
8
12.5%
-32.5%
1.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
12.5%
Bias Score
-32.5%
6
#6G Ward
8
12.5%
-32.5%
1.8
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
12.5%
Bias Score
-32.5%
7
#7J Brooks
7
14.3%
-30.7%
1.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
14.3%
Bias Score
-30.7%
8
#8K Wright
14
14.3%
-30.7%
1.1
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
14
Win Rate
14.3%
Bias Score
-30.7%
9
#9G Hegley
7
14.3%
-30.7%
0.7
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
14.3%
Bias Score
-30.7%
10
#10M Thorpe
7
14.3%
-30.7%
0.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
14.3%
Bias Score
-30.7%
11
#11M Russell
6
16.7%
-28.3%
0.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
12
#12J Oldham
6
16.7%
-28.3%
2.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
13
#13A Woolmer
12
16.7%
-28.3%
0.9
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
12
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
14
#14T Harrington
6
16.7%
-28.3%
1.2
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
16.7%
Bias Score
-28.3%
15
#15D Webb
11
18.2%
-26.8%
1.4
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
11
Win Rate
18.2%
Bias Score
-26.8%
16
#16M Woods
5
20.0%
-25.0%
2.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
17
#17L Doughty
5
20.0%
-25.0%
2.8
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
18
#18G Sutton
5
20.0%
-25.0%
0.8
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
19
#19M Jones
5
20.0%
-25.0%
2.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
20
#20P Crossley
5
20.0%
-25.0%
1.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
5
Win Rate
20.0%
Bias Score
-25.0%
21
#21K Stroud
9
22.2%
-22.8%
2.2
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
22.2%
Bias Score
-22.8%
22
#22C Breakspear
8
25.0%
-20.0%
2.0
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
23
#23G Scott
8
25.0%
-20.0%
1.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
24
#24F Graham
8
25.0%
-20.0%
1.3
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
25
#25A Bates
8
25.0%
-20.0%
1.6
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
26
#26A Penn
8
25.0%
-20.0%
0.9
🚨 Strong Bias
Games
8
Win Rate
25.0%
Bias Score
-20.0%
27
#27G Salisbury
19
26.3%
-18.7%
1.2
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
19
Win Rate
26.3%
Bias Score
-18.7%
28
#28D Deadman
11
27.3%
-17.7%
1.9
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
11
Win Rate
27.3%
Bias Score
-17.7%
29
#29A Backhouse
7
28.6%
-16.4%
2.0
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
7
Win Rate
28.6%
Bias Score
-16.4%
30
#30J Busby
10
30.0%
-15.0%
1.4
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
10
Win Rate
30.0%
Bias Score
-15.0%
31
#31L Mason
10
30.0%
-15.0%
1.4
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
10
Win Rate
30.0%
Bias Score
-15.0%
32
#32N Miller
16
31.3%
-13.8%
0.8
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
16
Win Rate
31.3%
Bias Score
-13.8%
33
#33N Hair
9
33.3%
-11.7%
0.7
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
34
#34S Oldham
9
33.3%
-11.7%
1.7
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
9
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
35
#35D Whitestone
12
33.3%
-11.7%
0.9
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
12
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
36
#36A Haines
18
33.3%
-11.7%
1.3
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
18
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
37
#37D Bond
6
33.3%
-11.7%
2.2
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
38
#38O Langford
6
33.3%
-11.7%
0.8
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
39
#39K Friend
6
33.3%
-11.7%
1.5
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
40
#40P Tierney
6
33.3%
-11.7%
0.7
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
6
Win Rate
33.3%
Bias Score
-11.7%
41
#41C Boyeson
20
35.0%
-10.0%
1.8
⚠️ Potential Bias
Games
20
Win Rate
35.0%
Bias Score
-10.0%
42
#42S Mathieson
14
35.7%
-9.3%
1.1
📊 Neutral
Games
14
Win Rate
35.7%
Bias Score
-9.3%
43
#43E Ilderton
19
36.8%
-8.2%
1.1
📊 Neutral
Games
19
Win Rate
36.8%
Bias Score
-8.2%
44
#44B Toner
8
37.5%
-7.5%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
37.5%
Bias Score
-7.5%
45
#45M Coy
13
38.5%
-6.5%
1.3
📊 Neutral
Games
13
Win Rate
38.5%
Bias Score
-6.5%
46
#46A Chilowicz
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
47
#47T Kirk
5
40.0%
-5.0%
2.8
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
48
#48S Hooper
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.6
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
49
#49A D'Urso
10
40.0%
-5.0%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
10
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
50
#50I Williamson
5
40.0%
-5.0%
2.4
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
51
#51R Shoebridge
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.2
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
52
#52P Melin
5
40.0%
-5.0%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
5
Win Rate
40.0%
Bias Score
-5.0%
53
#53J Simpson
7
42.9%
-2.1%
2.4
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
54
#54C Sarginson
7
42.9%
-2.1%
1.1
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
55
#55N Swarbrick
7
42.9%
-2.1%
0.9
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
56
#56P Taylor
7
42.9%
-2.1%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
57
#57R Beeby
7
42.9%
-2.1%
1.6
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
58
#58G Laws
7
42.9%
-2.1%
1.0
📊 Neutral
Games
7
Win Rate
42.9%
Bias Score
-2.1%
59
#59D Rock
9
44.4%
-0.6%
2.4
📊 Neutral
Games
9
Win Rate
44.4%
Bias Score
-0.6%
60
#60K Hill
11
45.5%
+0.5%
1.4
📊 Neutral
Games
11
Win Rate
45.5%
Bias Score
+0.5%
61
#61S Stockbridge
15
46.7%
+1.7%
1.5
📊 Neutral
Games
15
Win Rate
46.7%
Bias Score
+1.7%
62
#62T Parsons
6
50.0%
+5.0%
1.7
📊 Neutral
Games
6
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
63
#63D Drysdale
20
50.0%
+5.0%
1.6
📊 Neutral
Games
20
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
64
#64C Hicks
8
50.0%
+5.0%
1.8
📊 Neutral
Games
8
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
65
#65M Heywood
6
50.0%
+5.0%
1.2
📊 Neutral
Games
6
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
66
#66C Webster
10
50.0%
+5.0%
1.1
📊 Neutral
Games
10
Win Rate
50.0%
Bias Score
+5.0%
67
#67D Handley
7
57.1%
+12.1%
2.0
✅ Favorable
Games
7
Win Rate
57.1%
Bias Score
+12.1%
68
#68C Brook
5
60.0%
+15.0%
1.8
✅ Favorable
Games
5
Win Rate
60.0%
Bias Score
+15.0%
69
#69A Kitchen
5
60.0%
+15.0%
0.8
✅ Favorable
Games
5
Win Rate
60.0%
Bias Score
+15.0%
70
#70M Oliver
5
60.0%
+15.0%
1.0
✅ Favorable
Games
5
Win Rate
60.0%
Bias Score
+15.0%
71
#71K Johnson
8
62.5%
+17.5%
2.3
✅ Favorable
Games
8
Win Rate
62.5%
Bias Score
+17.5%
72
#72S Tanner
8
62.5%
+17.5%
1.8
✅ Favorable
Games
8
Win Rate
62.5%
Bias Score
+17.5%
73
#73O Yates
11
63.6%
+18.6%
2.6
✅ Favorable
Games
11
Win Rate
63.6%
Bias Score
+18.6%
74
#74M Halsey
6
66.7%
+21.7%
0.3
✅ Favorable
Games
6
Win Rate
66.7%
Bias Score
+21.7%
75
#75A Hall
6
66.7%
+21.7%
1.5
✅ Favorable
Games
6
Win Rate
66.7%
Bias Score
+21.7%
76
#76R Joyce
16
68.8%
+23.8%
1.0
✅ Favorable
Games
16
Win Rate
68.8%
Bias Score
+23.8%
77
#77A Herczeg
7
71.4%
+26.4%
1.4
✅ Favorable
Games
7
Win Rate
71.4%
Bias Score
+26.4%
78
#78T Kettle
14
71.4%
+26.4%
1.5
✅ Favorable
Games
14
Win Rate
71.4%
Bias Score
+26.4%
79
#79B Speedie
6
83.3%
+38.3%
1.5
✅ Favorable
Games
6
Win Rate
83.3%
Bias Score
+38.3%
80
#80D Bourne
5
100.0%
+55.0%
1.0
✅ Favorable
Games
5
Win Rate
100.0%
Bias Score
+55.0%
Note: Showing 80 referees with 5+ games. Bias Score compares win rate under each referee vs. baseline (45%). Click any referee for detailed match-by-match analysis.