πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

T RobinsonvsWycombe

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-7.5%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-7.5%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

13 Mar 2021
Preston (H)
Championship
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 2
Preston:
🟨 1
30 Jan 2018
Luton (A)
League Two
WIN
3 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 4
Luton:
🟨 1
10 Sept 2016
Portsmouth (A)
League Two
LOSS
2 - 4
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 7
Portsmouth:
🟨 2
19 Mar 2016
Carlisle (A)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
Carlisle:
🟨 2
12 Sept 2015
Plymouth (H)
League Two
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 2
Plymouth:
🟨 4
7 Mar 2015
Southend (A)
League Two
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 3
Southend:
🟨 2
1 Nov 2014
Oxford (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 3
Oxford:
🟨 2
25 Jan 2014
Mansfield (A)
League Two
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
β€”
Mansfield:
🟨 2

When T Robinson officiates Wycombe matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wycombe achieves a 37.5% win rate under T Robinson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 7.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)37.5%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-7.5%

Cards for Wycombe

🟨 Yellows / Game2.75
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.13

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.00
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.