🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

T ReevesvsWoking

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
0
Losses
FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Woking has historically performed 15 percentage points better under T Reeves than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

6 Mar 2021
King�s Lynn (H)
National League
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Woking:
🟨 2
King�s Lynn:
28 Dec 2020
Eastleigh (H)
National League
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Woking:
🟨 2
Eastleigh:
🟨 1
13 Oct 2020
Dag and Red (H)
National League
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Woking:
🟨 2
Dag and Red:
🟨 3
7 Dec 2019
Hartlepool (H)
National League
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Woking:
🟨 3
Hartlepool:
🟨 3
7 Sept 2019
Hartlepool (A)
National League
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Woking:
🟨 4
Hartlepool:
🟨 2

When T Reeves officiates Woking matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Woking achieves a 60% win rate under T Reeves, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Woking

🟨 Yellows / Game2.60
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.80
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.