πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

T ParsonsvsReading

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
0
Draws
1
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+35.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +35.0%, Reading has historically performed 35 percentage points better under T Parsons than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+35.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

29 Nov 2025
Blackpool (A)
League One
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Blackpool:
🟨 1
30 Aug 2025
Port Vale (H)
League One
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 2
Port Vale:
🟨 2
15 Feb 2025
Rotherham (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Rotherham:
🟨 3
29 Oct 2024
Stockport (A)
League One
LOSS
1 - 4
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Stockport:
🟨 1
29 Mar 2024
Northampton (H)
League One
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Northampton:
🟨 1

When T Parsons officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 80% win rate under T Parsons, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)80.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+35.0%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.00
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.60
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.