S TannervsReading
Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When S Tanner officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 54.5% win rate under S Tanner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 9.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
📊 NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
11 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Mar 2011 | Barnsley(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Barnsley: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 6 Nov 2010 | QPR(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 QPR: 🟨 2🟥 1 | Championship |
| 22 Dec 2007 | Sunderland(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Reading: — Sunderland: 🟨 4 | Premier League |
| 24 Nov 2007 | Man City(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2 Man City: — | Premier League |
| 15 Sept 2007 | Sunderland(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2 Sunderland: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 23 Dec 2006 | Everton(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: — Everton: — | Premier League |
| 11 Mar 2006 | Watford(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 Watford: — | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2005 | Wolves(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Reading: — Wolves: — | Championship |
| 16 Oct 2005 | Ipswich(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Reading: — Ipswich: 🟨 5 | Championship |
| 20 Aug 2005 | Millwall(H) | 5 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Millwall: 🟨 3🟥 1 | Championship |
| 16 Apr 2005 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Nott'm Forest: 🟨 2🟥 1 | Championship |
When S Tanner officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 54.5% win rate under S Tanner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 9.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.