πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

S TannervsCrewe

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-7.5%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-7.5%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

10 Dec 2011
Northampton (A)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
🟨 1
Northampton:
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1
15 Jan 2011
Port Vale (H)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
🟨 1
Port Vale:
🟨 2
24 Feb 2010
Chesterfield (H)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
β€”
Chesterfield:
🟨 1
2 Sept 2006
Huddersfield (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
🟨 1
Huddersfield:
🟨 2
1 Apr 2006
QPR (A)
Championship
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
β€”
QPR:
🟨 2
13 Sept 2005
Plymouth (A)
Championship
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
🟨 2
Plymouth:
🟨 2
19 Mar 2005
Cardiff (A)
Championship
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
β€”
Cardiff:
β€”
31 Jan 2004
Millwall (H)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Crewe:
β€”
Millwall:
🟨 1

When S Tanner officiates Crewe matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Crewe achieves a 37.5% win rate under S Tanner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 7.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)37.5%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-7.5%

Cards for Crewe

🟨 Yellows / Game0.63
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.50
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.13

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.