πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

S PurkissvsCambridge

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
1
Draws
1
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Cambridge has historically performed 15 percentage points better under S Purkiss than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

28 Oct 2023
Carlisle (H)
League One
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Cambridge:
🟨 2
Carlisle:
β€”πŸŸ₯ 2
13 Aug 2022
Exeter (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Cambridge:
🟨 3
Exeter:
🟨 2
11 Sept 2021
Lincoln (H)
League One
LOSS
1 - 5
Cards Awarded:
Cambridge:
🟨 3
Lincoln:
β€”
20 Feb 2021
Mansfield (A)
League Two
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Cambridge:
β€”
Mansfield:
🟨 1
26 Sept 2020
Tranmere (H)
League Two
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Cambridge:
🟨 3
Tranmere:
β€”

When S Purkiss officiates Cambridge matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cambridge achieves a 60% win rate under S Purkiss, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Cambridge

🟨 Yellows / Game2.20
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.60
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.40

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.