πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

S BrattvsSwindon

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
0
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Swindon has historically performed 15 percentage points better under S Bratt than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

30 Nov 2013
Carlisle (H)
League One
WIN
3 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Swindon:
β€”
Carlisle:
🟨 2
31 Jan 2009
Oldham (A)
League One
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Swindon:
🟨 3
Oldham:
β€”
2 Feb 2008
Northampton (H)
League One
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Swindon:
🟨 2
Northampton:
🟨 1
10 Mar 2007
Accrington (H)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Swindon:
β€”
Accrington:
🟨 3
21 Oct 2006
Shrewsbury (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Swindon:
🟨 3
Shrewsbury:
β€”

When S Bratt officiates Swindon matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Swindon achieves a 60% win rate under S Bratt, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Swindon

🟨 Yellows / Game1.60
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.20
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.