πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

R WatkinsvsRochdale

Analysis based on 4 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

1
Wins
2
Draws
1
Losses
🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-20.0%
Matches Analyzed
4
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -20.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 4 matches, Rochdale has won 20 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Watkins is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-20.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

4 matches under this referee

13 Sept 2025
Truro (A)
National League
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Truro:
🟨 2
1 Apr 2025
Woking (A)
National League
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 1
Woking:
🟨 3
2 Dec 2023
Bromley (A)
National League
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Bromley:
β€”
19 Sept 2023
Boreham Wood (A)
National League
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
β€”
Boreham Wood:
🟨 1

When R Watkins officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 4 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 25% win rate under R Watkins, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)25.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-20.0%

Cards for Rochdale

🟨 Yellows / Game1.25
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.50
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.