R OliviervsCambridge
Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Olivier officiates Cambridge matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cambridge achieves a 0% win rate under R Olivier, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -45.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Cambridge has won 45 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Olivier is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
6 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 May 2005 | Notts County(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Cambridge: π¨ 1 Notts County: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 6 Nov 2004 | Rochdale(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 5π₯ 1 Rochdale: π¨ 1π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 17 Feb 2004 | Carlisle(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Cambridge: β Carlisle: π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 6 Feb 2002 | Stoke(A) | 0 - 5 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 1 Stoke: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 6 Mar 2001 | Luton(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 3 Luton: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 19 Aug 2000 | Bournemouth(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Cambridge: π¨ 1π₯ 1 Bournemouth: π¨ 3 | League One |
When R Olivier officiates Cambridge matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cambridge achieves a 0% win rate under R Olivier, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Cambridge
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.33 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.