πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

R LewisvsLuton

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-7.5%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-7.5%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

15 Sept 2018
Bristol Rvs (H)
League One
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 1
Bristol Rvs:
🟨 1
11 Nov 2017
Cheltenham (A)
League Two
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 3
Cheltenham:
β€”
21 Nov 2015
Stevenage (A)
League Two
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
Stevenage:
🟨 2
19 Sept 2015
Mansfield (H)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 1
Mansfield:
🟨 3
3 Apr 2015
Exeter (H)
League Two
LOSS
2 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 3
Exeter:
β€”
2 Mar 2010
Mansfield (A)
National League
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 4
Mansfield:
β€”
18 Aug 2009
Forest Green (A)
National League
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 1
Forest Green:
🟨 1
8 Mar 2008
Southend (A)
League One
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Luton:
🟨 1
Southend:
β€”

When R Lewis officiates Luton matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Luton achieves a 37.5% win rate under R Lewis, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 7.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)37.5%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-7.5%

Cards for Luton

🟨 Yellows / Game1.88
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.13

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.88
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.