R JonesvsReading
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Jones officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 14.3% win rate under R Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -30.7%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 31 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Jones is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Jan 2022 | Huddersfield(H) | 3 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Huddersfield: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 14 Sept 2019 | Middlesbrough(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Middlesbrough: — | Championship |
| 16 Feb 2019 | Sheffield United(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Sheffield United: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 29 Dec 2018 | QPR(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 QPR: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 3 Aug 2018 | Derby(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Derby: 🟨 4 | Championship |
| 13 Mar 2018 | Wolves(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2 Wolves: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 30 Jan 2018 | Burton(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 3 Burton: 🟨 3 | Championship |
When R Jones officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 14.3% win rate under R Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.