πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

R BoothvsWycombe

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
1
Draws
1
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Wycombe has historically performed 15 percentage points better under R Booth than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

21 Nov 2009
Millwall (A)
League One
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 1
Millwall:
β€”
28 Dec 2008
Gillingham (A)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 1
Gillingham:
β€”
15 Apr 2008
Grimsby (A)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
β€”
Grimsby:
β€”
26 Aug 2006
Macclesfield (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 2
Macclesfield:
🟨 2
28 Dec 2004
Macclesfield (A)
League Two
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
β€”
Macclesfield:
🟨 1

When R Booth officiates Wycombe matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wycombe achieves a 60% win rate under R Booth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Wycombe

🟨 Yellows / Game0.80
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.60
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.