R BoothvsLincoln
Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Booth officiates Lincoln matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Lincoln achieves a 12.5% win rate under R Booth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 32.5 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -32.5%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 8 matches, Lincoln has won 33 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Booth is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
8 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Mar 2011 | Port Vale(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Lincoln: 🟨 1 Port Vale: 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 1 Dec 2009 | Port Vale(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Lincoln: — Port Vale: 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 24 Feb 2007 | Accrington(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Lincoln: 🟨 3 Accrington: 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 8 Jan 2007 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Lincoln: 🟨 1🟥 1 Milton Keynes Dons: — | League Two |
| 3 Dec 2005 | Macclesfield(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Lincoln: 🟨 1 Macclesfield: 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 29 Oct 2005 | Rochdale(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Lincoln: 🟨 1 Rochdale: 🟨 3🟥 1 | League Two |
| 9 Aug 2005 | Chester(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Lincoln: 🟨 3🟥 1 Chester: 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 12 Feb 2005 | Rochdale(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Lincoln: 🟨 1 Rochdale: 🟨 1🟥 1 | League Two |
When R Booth officiates Lincoln matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Lincoln achieves a 12.5% win rate under R Booth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 32.5 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Lincoln
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.25 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.