R BoothvsBurnley
Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Booth officiates Burnley matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Burnley achieves a 40% win rate under R Booth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
📊 NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
5 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Dec 2010 | Leeds(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Burnley: — Leeds: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 21 Mar 2009 | Plymouth(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Burnley: 🟨 1 Plymouth: — | Championship |
| 20 Dec 2008 | Bristol City(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Burnley: — Bristol City: — | Championship |
| 5 Apr 2008 | Norwich(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Burnley: 🟨 4 Norwich: — | Championship |
| 30 Apr 2006 | Luton(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Burnley: — Luton: 🟨 2 | Championship |
When R Booth officiates Burnley matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Burnley achieves a 40% win rate under R Booth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Burnley
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.