P RichardsvsNott'm Forest
Analysis based on 3 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When P Richards officiates Nott'm Forest matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 3 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Nott'm Forest achieves a 33.3% win rate under P Richards, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
β οΈ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
3 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2001 | Crystal Palace(H) | 4 - 2 | WIN | Nott'm Forest: π¨ 2 Crystal Palace: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 3 Mar 2001 | Wolves(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Nott'm Forest: π¨ 4π₯ 2 Wolves: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 18 Nov 2000 | Wimbledon(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Nott'm Forest: π¨ 4 Wimbledon: π¨ 2 | Championship |
When P Richards officiates Nott'm Forest matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 3 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Nott'm Forest achieves a 33.3% win rate under P Richards, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Nott'm Forest
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.67 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.