πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

P MillervsPeterboro

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
1
Draws
3
Losses
⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-11.7%
Matches Analyzed
6

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-11.7%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

27 Sept 2011
Portsmouth (A)
Championship
WIN
3 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Portsmouth:
🟨 1
14 Aug 2010
Bournemouth (A)
League One
LOSS
1 - 5
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 3
Bournemouth:
🟨 1
28 Dec 2008
Cheltenham (A)
League One
WIN
6 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
β€”
Cheltenham:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
5 May 2007
Rochdale (H)
League Two
DRAW
3 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
β€”
Rochdale:
β€”
15 Apr 2006
Boston (H)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 2
Boston:
🟨 2
24 Sept 2005
Shrewsbury (H)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Shrewsbury:
🟨 3

When P Miller officiates Peterboro matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Peterboro achieves a 33.3% win rate under P Miller, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)33.3%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-11.7%

Cards for Peterboro

🟨 Yellows / Game1.17
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.33
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.17

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.