πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

P JoslinvsWrexham

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
3
Draws
1
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+5.0%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+5.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

24 Sept 2006
Hereford (H)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 3
Hereford:
🟨 2
15 Apr 2006
Stockport (A)
League Two
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 2
Stockport:
🟨 1
19 Nov 2005
Peterboro (H)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 2
Peterboro:
🟨 2
29 Jan 2005
Doncaster (H)
League One
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
β€”
Doncaster:
🟨 2
4 Feb 2003
Oxford (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 2
Oxford:
🟨 1
14 Sept 2002
Swansea (H)
League Two
WIN
4 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
β€”
Swansea:
🟨 2
6 Mar 2001
Oxford (H)
League One
WIN
5 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 1
Oxford:
β€”
16 Sept 2000
Colchester (A)
League One
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
β€”πŸŸ₯ 1
Colchester:
🟨 1

When P Joslin officiates Wrexham matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wrexham achieves a 50% win rate under P Joslin, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)50.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+5.0%

Cards for Wrexham

🟨 Yellows / Game1.25
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.13

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.38
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.