P BankesvsReading
Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When P Bankes officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 25% win rate under P Bankes, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -20.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 8 matches, Reading has won 20 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when P Bankes is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
8 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Feb 2022 | Blackpool(A) | 1 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: — Blackpool: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 25 Sept 2021 | Middlesbrough(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 3 Middlesbrough: 🟨 3🟥 1 | Championship |
| 21 Aug 2019 | West Brom(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 West Brom: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 16 Dec 2017 | Ipswich(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 4 Ipswich: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 25 Feb 2017 | Brighton(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Brighton: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 21 Jan 2017 | Derby(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1🟥 1 Derby: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 20 Dec 2015 | Blackburn(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Blackburn: 🟨 4 | Championship |
| 8 Aug 2015 | Birmingham(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 5 Birmingham: 🟨 4 | Championship |
When P Bankes officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 25% win rate under P Bankes, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.