M SalisburyvsCheltenham
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Salisbury officiates Cheltenham matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cheltenham achieves a 28.6% win rate under M Salisbury, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Cheltenham has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Salisbury is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2019 | Leyton Orient(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Cheltenham: —🟥 2 Leyton Orient: — | League Two |
| 22 Sept 2018 | Exeter(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Cheltenham: 🟨 2 Exeter: 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 5 May 2018 | Crewe(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Cheltenham: 🟨 1 Crewe: 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 11 Feb 2017 | Notts County(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Cheltenham: 🟨 1 Notts County: 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 17 Dec 2016 | Morecambe(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Cheltenham: 🟨 1 Morecambe: 🟨 1🟥 1 | League Two |
| 16 Aug 2016 | Carlisle(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Cheltenham: 🟨 3 Carlisle: 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 13 Feb 2016 | Welling United(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Cheltenham: — Welling United: — | National League |
When M Salisbury officiates Cheltenham matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cheltenham achieves a 28.6% win rate under M Salisbury, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Cheltenham
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.29 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.