πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

M RussellvsWycombe

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
3
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-7.5%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-7.5%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

25 Mar 2014
Burton (A)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
β€”
Burton:
🟨 1
16 Nov 2013
Cheltenham (H)
League Two
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 1
Cheltenham:
β€”
13 Nov 2010
Bradford (H)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 2
Bradford:
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1
21 Apr 2009
Luton (A)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 2
Luton:
🟨 1
30 Dec 2006
Lincoln (A)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
β€”
Lincoln:
🟨 1
19 Nov 2005
Grimsby (H)
League Two
WIN
3 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 1
Grimsby:
🟨 2
13 Aug 2005
Oxford (A)
League Two
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
🟨 1
Oxford:
🟨 1
22 Jan 2005
Macclesfield (H)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wycombe:
β€”
Macclesfield:
🟨 1

When M Russell officiates Wycombe matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wycombe achieves a 37.5% win rate under M Russell, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 7.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)37.5%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-7.5%

Cards for Wycombe

🟨 Yellows / Game0.88
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.13
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.13

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.