M RussellvsReading
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Russell officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 14.3% win rate under M Russell, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -30.7%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 31 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Russell is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2025 | Doncaster(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 1 Doncaster: 🟨 1 | League One |
| 28 Feb 2015 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Nott'm Forest: — | Championship |
| 3 May 2014 | Burnley(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 1 Burnley: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 10 Apr 2012 | Brighton(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 3 Brighton: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 14 Aug 2010 | Portsmouth(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: — Portsmouth: — | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2009 | Swansea(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 1 Swansea: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 22 Aug 2009 | Sheffield United(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: — Sheffield United: 🟨 2 | Championship |
When M Russell officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 14.3% win rate under M Russell, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.