πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

M RussellvsNott'm Forest

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-2.1%
Matches Analyzed
7

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-2.1%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

28 Feb 2015
Reading (A)
Championship
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
β€”
Reading:
🟨 1
26 Oct 2013
Yeovil (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 3
Yeovil:
🟨 4
16 Feb 2011
Scunthorpe (A)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
β€”
Scunthorpe:
🟨 1
28 Sept 2010
Sheffield United (H)
Championship
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 1
Sheffield United:
🟨 2
5 Dec 2009
Leicester (H)
Championship
WIN
5 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 1
Leicester:
🟨 1
9 Sept 2006
Yeovil (A)
League One
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 2
Yeovil:
β€”
17 Jan 2006
Brentford (A)
League One
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 3πŸŸ₯ 1
Brentford:
🟨 5

When M Russell officiates Nott'm Forest matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Nott'm Forest achieves a 42.9% win rate under M Russell, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 2.1 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)42.9%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-2.1%

Cards for Nott'm Forest

🟨 Yellows / Game1.43
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.14

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.00
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.