M HeywoodvsCarlisle
Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Heywood officiates Carlisle matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Carlisle achieves a 33.3% win rate under M Heywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
β οΈ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
9 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept 2018 | Bury(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Carlisle: π¨ 5π₯ 1 Bury: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 5 May 2018 | Newport County(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Carlisle: β Newport County: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 4 Mar 2017 | Plymouth(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Carlisle: π¨ 3 Plymouth: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 10 Dec 2016 | Luton(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Carlisle: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Luton: π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 10 Jan 2015 | Cambridge(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Carlisle: π¨ 1 Cambridge: π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 8 Feb 2014 | Gillingham(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Carlisle: π¨ 2 Gillingham: β | League One |
| 19 Oct 2013 | Oldham(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Carlisle: π¨ 2 Oldham: π¨ 3 | League One |
| 27 Mar 2012 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Carlisle: π¨ 2 Milton Keynes Dons: β | League One |
| 26 Nov 2011 | Colchester(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Carlisle: β Colchester: β | League One |
When M Heywood officiates Carlisle matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Carlisle achieves a 33.3% win rate under M Heywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Carlisle
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.22 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.