M HaywoodvsReading
Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Haywood officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 16.7% win rate under M Haywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Reading has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Haywood is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
6 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Mar 2015 | Bolton(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 Bolton: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 21 Oct 2014 | Bournemouth(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: — Bournemouth: — | Championship |
| 5 Apr 2011 | Preston(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Preston: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 19 Dec 2009 | Bristol City(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2🟥 1 Bristol City: — | Championship |
| 26 Sept 2009 | Watford(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: — Watford: 🟨 1🟥 1 | Championship |
| 28 Oct 2008 | Burnley(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: — Burnley: — | Championship |
When M Haywood officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 16.7% win rate under M Haywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.17 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.