πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

M FletchervsBrighton

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
1
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-5.0%
Matches Analyzed
5

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-5.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

20 Nov 2005
Crystal Palace (H)
Championship
LOSS
2 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Brighton:
🟨 4πŸŸ₯ 1
Crystal Palace:
🟨 2
30 Aug 2003
Plymouth (A)
League One
DRAW
3 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Brighton:
🟨 2
Plymouth:
🟨 2
18 Mar 2003
Sheffield United (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Brighton:
🟨 4
Sheffield United:
🟨 3
1 Apr 2002
Bristol City (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Brighton:
β€”
Bristol City:
🟨 1
14 Mar 2001
Barnet (H)
League Two
WIN
4 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Brighton:
🟨 2
Barnet:
🟨 4

When M Fletcher officiates Brighton matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Brighton achieves a 40% win rate under M Fletcher, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)40.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-5.0%

Cards for Brighton

🟨 Yellows / Game2.40
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.20

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.40
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00
πŸ’°

Betting Outlook

TIPSTER INSIGHT
πŸŸ₯

RED CARD RISK

Red card frequency: 0.2 per game

Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.

⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.