M DeanvsReading
Analysis based on 13 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Dean officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 13 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 15.4% win rate under M Dean, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 29.6 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -29.6%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 13 matches, Reading has won 30 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Dean is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
13 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2018 | Leeds(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2 Leeds: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 19 May 2013 | West Ham(A) | 2 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 West Ham: 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 20 Apr 2013 | Norwich(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Norwich: 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 22 Dec 2012 | Man City(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Man City: 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 6 Oct 2012 | Swansea(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 3 Swansea: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 13 Apr 2012 | Southampton(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: — Southampton: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 20 Dec 2008 | Birmingham(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 2 Birmingham: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 30 Jan 2008 | Chelsea(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: — Chelsea: — | Premier League |
| 1 Jan 2008 | Portsmouth(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3🟥 1 Portsmouth: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 15 Aug 2007 | Chelsea(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 4🟥 1 Chelsea: 🟨 5 | Premier League |
| 30 Dec 2006 | Man United(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2🟥 1 Man United: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 9 Mar 2002 | Brighton(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 3 Brighton: 🟨 2 | League One |
| 6 Jan 2001 | Millwall(H) | 3 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Millwall: 🟨 4 | League One |
When M Dean officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 13 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 15.4% win rate under M Dean, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 29.6 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.23 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.