M ClattenburgvsRochdale
Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Clattenburg officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 16.7% win rate under M Clattenburg, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Rochdale has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Clattenburg is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
6 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Mar 2004 | Huddersfield(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Rochdale: 🟨 1 Huddersfield: 🟨 3 | League Two |
| 18 Mar 2003 | Scunthorpe(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Rochdale: 🟨 4 Scunthorpe: 🟨 3 | League Two |
| 28 Sept 2002 | Macclesfield(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Rochdale: 🟨 1 Macclesfield: — | League Two |
| 19 Jan 2002 | Oxford(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Rochdale: 🟨 1 Oxford: 🟨 2 | League Two |
| 18 Sept 2001 | Hull(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Rochdale: 🟨 1 Hull: 🟨 1🟥 1 | League Two |
| 23 Mar 2001 | Cheltenham(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Rochdale: 🟨 1 Cheltenham: 🟨 1 | League Two |
When M Clattenburg officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 16.7% win rate under M Clattenburg, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Rochdale
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.