M BullvsKettering Town
Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Bull officiates Kettering Town matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Kettering Town achieves a 0% win rate under M Bull, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -45.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 5 matches, Kettering Town has won 45 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Bull is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
5 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Apr 2012 | Barrow(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Kettering Town: π¨ 2 Barrow: β | National League |
| 21 Feb 2012 | Forest Green(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Kettering Town: β Forest Green: β | National League |
| 23 Aug 2011 | York(H) | 1 - 5 | LOSS | Kettering Town: π¨ 1 York: π¨ 1 | National League |
| 27 Feb 2010 | Rushden & D(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Kettering Town: π¨ 2 Rushden & D: π¨ 2 | National League |
| 27 Sept 2008 | Crawley Town(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Kettering Town: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Crawley Town: π¨ 2 | National League |
When M Bull officiates Kettering Town matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Kettering Town achieves a 0% win rate under M Bull, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Kettering Town
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.2 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.