L ProbertvsReading
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When L Probert officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 28.6% win rate under L Probert, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when L Probert is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2012 | Aston Villa(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: — Aston Villa: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 21 Aug 2010 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 Nott'm Forest: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 22 Nov 2008 | Southampton(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Southampton: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 5 Apr 2008 | Newcastle(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Newcastle: — | Premier League |
| 15 Dec 2007 | Birmingham(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 1 Birmingham: 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 13 Aug 2005 | Preston(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Reading: — Preston: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 21 Aug 2004 | Rotherham(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: — Rotherham: 🟨 3 | Championship |
When L Probert officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 28.6% win rate under L Probert, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.