L MasonvsWolves
Analysis based on 24 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When L Mason officiates Wolves matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 24 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wolves achieves a 25% win rate under L Mason, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -20.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 24 matches, Wolves has won 20 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when L Mason is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
24 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec 2020 | Burnley(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 1 Burnley: 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 25 Oct 2020 | Newcastle(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Wolves: — Newcastle: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 2 Feb 2019 | Everton(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Wolves: 🟨 1 Everton: 🟨 3 | Premier League |
| 20 Oct 2018 | Watford(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 3 Watford: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 6 May 2012 | Everton(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Wolves: — Everton: — | Premier League |
| 12 Feb 2012 | West Brom(H) | 1 - 5 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 1 West Brom: — | Premier League |
| 26 Nov 2011 | Chelsea(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 2 Chelsea: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 26 Apr 2011 | Stoke(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 2 Stoke: 🟨 3 | Premier League |
| 15 Jan 2011 | Man City(A) | 3 - 4 | LOSS | Wolves: — Man City: — | Premier League |
| 2 Oct 2010 | Wigan(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 2🟥 1 Wigan: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 21 Aug 2010 | Everton(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Wolves: 🟨 2 Everton: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 9 May 2010 | Sunderland(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Wolves: 🟨 1 Sunderland: 🟨 2🟥 2 | Premier League |
| 21 Nov 2009 | Chelsea(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 2 Chelsea: — | Premier League |
| 27 Sept 2009 | Sunderland(A) | 2 - 5 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 3 Sunderland: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 22 Aug 2009 | Man City(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Wolves: 🟨 1 Man City: — | Premier League |
| 15 Nov 2008 | Southampton(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Wolves: 🟨 2 Southampton: 🟨 3🟥 1 | Championship |
| 12 Feb 2008 | Blackpool(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Wolves: 🟨 2 Blackpool: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 1 Jan 2008 | Sheffield United(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Wolves: — Sheffield United: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 1 Sept 2007 | Stoke(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Wolves: 🟨 1 Stoke: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 17 Oct 2006 | Coventry(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Wolves: 🟨 2 Coventry: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 10 Sept 2006 | Leeds(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Wolves: 🟨 3 Leeds: — | Championship |
| 11 Feb 2006 | Crewe(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Wolves: — Crewe: — | Championship |
| 13 Aug 2005 | Hull(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Wolves: 🟨 1 Hull: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 27 Nov 2004 | Sheffield United(A) | 3 - 3 | DRAW | Wolves: — Sheffield United: — | Championship |
When L Mason officiates Wolves matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 24 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wolves achieves a 25% win rate under L Mason, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Wolves
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.