L CablevsCambridge
Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When L Cable officiates Cambridge matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cambridge achieves a 20% win rate under L Cable, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 25.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -25.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 5 matches, Cambridge has won 25 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when L Cable is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
5 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2003 | Mansfield(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Mansfield: π¨ 4π₯ 2 | League Two |
| 13 Apr 2002 | Tranmere(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Cambridge: β Tranmere: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 18 Sept 2001 | Reading(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 3 Reading: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 10 Mar 2001 | Wrexham(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 1 Wrexham: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 28 Oct 2000 | Millwall(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Cambridge: π¨ 2 Millwall: π¨ 4 | League One |
When L Cable officiates Cambridge matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cambridge achieves a 20% win rate under L Cable, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 25.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Cambridge
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.2 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.