πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

K StroudvsRochdale

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
1
Draws
0
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+35.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +35.0%, Rochdale has historically performed 35 percentage points better under K Stroud than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+35.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

19 Aug 2014
Crewe (A)
League One
WIN
5 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Crewe:
🟨 1
21 Nov 2009
Dag and Red (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 1
Dag and Red:
β€”πŸŸ₯ 1
29 Aug 2009
Bury (H)
League Two
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 3
Bury:
🟨 4
24 Sept 2005
Barnet (A)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Barnet:
🟨 3
21 Aug 2004
Wycombe (A)
League Two
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 3
Wycombe:
β€”

When K Stroud officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 80% win rate under K Stroud, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)80.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+35.0%

Cards for Rochdale

🟨 Yellows / Game2.20
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.60
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.20

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.