K StroudvsCharlton
Analysis based on 21 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When K Stroud officiates Charlton matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 21 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Charlton achieves a 19% win rate under K Stroud, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 26.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -26.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 21 matches, Charlton has won 26 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when K Stroud is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
21 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Sept 2021 | Gillingham(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Charlton: β Gillingham: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 24 Apr 2021 | Peterboro(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Charlton: π¨ 1 Peterboro: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 26 Dec 2019 | Bristol City(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | Charlton: π¨ 3 Bristol City: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 5 Oct 2019 | Fulham(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Charlton: π¨ 1 Fulham: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 3 Feb 2018 | Oxford(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Charlton: π¨ 1 Oxford: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 14 Jan 2017 | Millwall(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Charlton: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Millwall: π¨ 4 | League One |
| 24 Sept 2016 | Oxford(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Charlton: βπ₯ 1 Oxford: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 30 Jan 2016 | Rotherham(A) | 4 - 1 | WIN | Charlton: π¨ 3 Rotherham: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 5 Dec 2015 | Brighton(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Charlton: π¨ 4π₯ 1 Brighton: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 12 Sept 2015 | Rotherham(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Charlton: π¨ 2 Rotherham: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 24 Oct 2014 | Fulham(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Charlton: β Fulham: β | Championship |
| 18 Jan 2014 | Middlesbrough(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Charlton: βπ₯ 1 Middlesbrough: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 9 Nov 2013 | Leeds(H) | 2 - 4 | LOSS | Charlton: π¨ 2 Leeds: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 14 Feb 2012 | Milton Keynes Dons(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Charlton: π¨ 1 Milton Keynes Dons: π¨ 2π₯ 1 | League One |
| 7 May 2011 | Hartlepool(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Charlton: π¨ 2 Hartlepool: π¨ 3 | League One |
| 8 Mar 2011 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Charlton: βπ₯ 1 Milton Keynes Dons: β | League One |
| 6 Mar 2010 | Stockport(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Charlton: π¨ 1 Stockport: β | League One |
| 28 Feb 2009 | Swansea(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Charlton: π¨ 5 Swansea: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 25 Nov 2008 | QPR(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Charlton: π¨ 1 QPR: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 29 Mar 2008 | Wolves(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Charlton: π¨ 3 Wolves: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 12 Feb 2008 | Sheffield Weds(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Charlton: π¨ 1 Sheffield Weds: π¨ 2 | Championship |
When K Stroud officiates Charlton matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 21 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Charlton achieves a 19% win rate under K Stroud, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 26.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Charlton
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.24 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.