K HillvsWimbledon
Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When K Hill officiates Wimbledon matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wimbledon achieves a 40% win rate under K Hill, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
📊 NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
5 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Jan 2004 | Crystal Palace(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Wimbledon: 🟨 2 Crystal Palace: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 9 Aug 2003 | Crewe(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Wimbledon: 🟨 1 Crewe: — | Championship |
| 1 Feb 2003 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Wimbledon: — Nott'm Forest: — | Championship |
| 12 Mar 2002 | Portsmouth(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Wimbledon: 🟨 2 Portsmouth: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 3 Mar 2001 | Stockport(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Wimbledon: — Stockport: — | Championship |
When K Hill officiates Wimbledon matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wimbledon achieves a 40% win rate under K Hill, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Wimbledon
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.