πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

K HillvsReading

Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
2
Draws
9
Losses
⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-18.3%
Matches Analyzed
15
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -18.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 15 matches, Reading has won 18 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when K Hill is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-18.3%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

15 matches under this referee

23 Apr 2016
QPR (A)
Championship
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
QPR:
β€”
28 Nov 2015
Nott'm Forest (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 3
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
7 Feb 2015
Wolves (A)
Championship
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 4
Wolves:
🟨 1
6 Dec 2014
Bolton (H)
Championship
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 3
Bolton:
β€”
16 Sept 2014
Millwall (H)
Championship
WIN
3 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Millwall:
🟨 2
8 Feb 2014
Sheffield Weds (H)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
Sheffield Weds:
🟨 4
11 Sept 2010
Crystal Palace (H)
Championship
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 2
Crystal Palace:
🟨 4
26 Oct 2009
Leicester (H)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 3
Leicester:
β€”
13 Sept 2008
Ipswich (A)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 2
Ipswich:
🟨 1
28 Aug 2004
Millwall (A)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 3
Millwall:
🟨 2
10 Apr 2004
Bradford (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”πŸŸ₯ 1
Bradford:
🟨 4πŸŸ₯ 1
30 Sept 2003
Norwich (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Norwich:
β€”
17 Aug 2002
Coventry (H)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Coventry:
🟨 3
16 Mar 2002
Chesterfield (A)
League One
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Chesterfield:
🟨 3
5 Oct 2001
Colchester (A)
League One
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Colchester:
🟨 2

When K Hill officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 26.7% win rate under K Hill, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 18.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)26.7%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-18.3%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.60
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.13

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.80
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.13

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.