J SimpsonvsReading
Analysis based on 19 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When J Simpson officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 19 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 47.4% win rate under J Simpson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 2.4 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
19 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2022 | Burnley(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 4 Burnley: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 7 May 2022 | Luton(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Luton: β | Championship |
| 29 Jan 2022 | QPR(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 2 QPR: π¨ 4 | Championship |
| 20 Oct 2021 | Blackpool(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: β Blackpool: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 2 Jan 2021 | Huddersfield(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 1 Huddersfield: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 28 Nov 2020 | Bristol City(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: β Bristol City: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Barnsley(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 1 Barnsley: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 30 Nov 2019 | Wigan(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 2 Wigan: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 22 Oct 2019 | QPR(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 2 QPR: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 16 Mar 2019 | Stoke(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 3 Stoke: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 23 Feb 2019 | Rotherham(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 1 Rotherham: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 22 Sept 2018 | Hull(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Reading: βπ₯ 1 Hull: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 21 Apr 2018 | Sheffield Weds(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: βπ₯ 1 Sheffield Weds: β | Championship |
| 14 Oct 2017 | Leeds(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 2 Leeds: π¨ 5 | Championship |
| 31 Jan 2017 | Birmingham(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 2 Birmingham: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 17 Dec 2016 | Blackburn(A) | 3 - 2 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 1 Blackburn: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 9 Sept 2016 | Ipswich(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 5 Ipswich: π¨ 4 | Championship |
| 16 Apr 2016 | Leeds(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 3 Leeds: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 20 Oct 2015 | Rotherham(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 1 Rotherham: π¨ 2 | Championship |
When J Simpson officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 19 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 47.4% win rate under J Simpson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 2.4 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.