J MossvsChester
Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When J Moss officiates Chester matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Chester achieves a 16.7% win rate under J Moss, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Chester has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when J Moss is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
6 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 May 2008 | Macclesfield(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Chester: β Macclesfield: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 1 Mar 2008 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Chester: π¨ 1 Milton Keynes Dons: π¨ 3 | League Two |
| 21 Apr 2007 | Boston(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Chester: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Boston: β | League Two |
| 30 Sept 2006 | Bristol Rvs(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Chester: π¨ 3 Bristol Rvs: β | League Two |
| 18 Mar 2006 | Cheltenham(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Chester: π¨ 2 Cheltenham: π¨ 3 | League Two |
| 28 Jan 2006 | Notts County(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Chester: βπ₯ 1 Notts County: π¨ 3 | League Two |
When J Moss officiates Chester matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Chester achieves a 16.7% win rate under J Moss, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Chester
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.33 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.