G RhodesvsBristol Rvs
Analysis based on 1 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When G Rhodes officiates Bristol Rvs matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 1 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Bristol Rvs achieves a 100% win rate under G Rhodes, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 55.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
β FAVORABLE RECORD
This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.
Favorable Pattern Detected
With a bias score of +55.0%, Bristol Rvs has historically performed 55 percentage points better under G Rhodes than their average. This favorable pattern across 1 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
1 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2025 | Salford(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Bristol Rvs: π¨ 1 Salford: π¨ 4π₯ 1 | League Two |
When G Rhodes officiates Bristol Rvs matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 1 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Bristol Rvs achieves a 100% win rate under G Rhodes, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 55.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Bristol Rvs
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.