πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

G LawsvsRochdale

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
2
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+5.0%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+5.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

13 Dec 2008
Bournemouth (H)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Bournemouth:
🟨 2
23 Feb 2008
Wycombe (H)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 1
Wycombe:
🟨 2
19 Mar 2005
Scunthorpe (H)
League Two
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 1
Scunthorpe:
🟨 1
29 Jan 2005
Rushden & D (H)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Rushden & D:
🟨 3
13 Dec 2003
Bury (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Bury:
β€”
17 Sept 2002
Cambridge (H)
League Two
WIN
4 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 3
Cambridge:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
30 Mar 2002
Leyton Orient (H)
League Two
WIN
3 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 1
Leyton Orient:
🟨 2
13 Jan 2001
Halifax (H)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rochdale:
🟨 2
Halifax:
β€”

When G Laws officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 50% win rate under G Laws, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)50.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+5.0%

Cards for Rochdale

🟨 Yellows / Game1.75
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.38
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.13

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.