G LawsvsReading
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When G Laws officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 28.6% win rate under G Laws, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when G Laws is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2005 | Hull(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: — Hull: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 22 Feb 2005 | Crewe(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: — Crewe: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 6 Nov 2004 | Stoke(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 1 Stoke: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 10 Aug 2002 | Derby(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Derby: 🟨 4 | Championship |
| 2 Mar 2002 | Cambridge(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 1 Cambridge: 🟨 2 | League One |
| 11 Aug 2001 | Blackpool(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Reading: 🟨 4 Blackpool: — | League One |
| 6 Oct 2000 | Wigan(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 Wigan: 🟨 2 | League One |
When G Laws officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 28.6% win rate under G Laws, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.